Islander nation up in arms over MSG not renewing Jaffe

On the news front, disappointing stuff kudos of MSG. But what would you expect from a network that couldn’t be bothered to air the Ilya Kovalchuk press conference (even if preliminary). Today, comes the latest disappointment with Islander TV color analyst Billy Jaffe not returning to the booth.

UPDATE: Per Chris Botta’s tweet:

ChrisBottaNHL: Multiple sources confirm: MSG had contract done for Billy Jaffe, Islanders shot it down. Reason: not positive enough.

If that really is the reason, it’s just pathetic. Does every broadcast have to always use rose colored glasses?!?!?!?!?! Between the mishandling of Bryan Trottier, firing their head scout and this, the Islanders yet again have egg on their face. Guess Charles Wang has a bit of Dolan in him too…

What a farce. At least in this blogger’s eyes, Jaffe and Howie Rose formed the best broadcast duo among the Battle clubs, demonstrating superb chemistry while educating and entertaining Islander fans. Even if you weren’t, it was easy to admire the style Jaffe brought from Atlanta to the telecasts- giving a no-nonsense approach that we rarely get from company man Joe Micheletti and Martin Brodeur loyalist extraordinaire Chico Resch.

With one of the best play-by-play men in Rose and one of the rising analysts in Jaffe who did solid work for Versus, the Islanders were not only a fun watch for John Tavares but for the back and forth banter we got from Howie and Billy. What we admired most about the tandem was that they knew when to turn it on, often getting into good discussions on the game. Whether it was taking a referee to task for a questionable call or debating rules or even telling cool stories, they always had the fans’ best interest.

So, how do you think they reacted to this? Close friend Angelica Rodriguez summed it up best:

ReinaDeLaIsla @BattleOfNewYork absolutely ridiculous. Howie and Billy’s broadcasts were my favorite part of Isles games most of the time. Ugh.

ReinaDeLaIsla @BattleOfNewYork seriously considering starting SOMETHING to try and bring him back… ahaha.

We second that notion! Some more reaction on Twitter echoed her sentiment:

NHLArenaNYIsles Looking@ all the comments on Botta’s page. #Isles fans keep saying Jaffe gone is cost cutting by NYI. But NYI aren’t the ones who pay him!

JeffMarek Sad day for NYI hockey: Billy Jaffe not renewed as Islanders TV analyst. Charles Wang to take over? He does everything else so why not?

ChrisBottaNHL In 90 minutes, 262 comments about the departure of Billy Jaffe – running about 95% pro Jaffe

BDGallof when I was in Philly, Billy Jaffe was hanging with the ESPN boys. He is well-respected & liked. Don’t expect him to be out of work for long

PuckCentral @ChrisBottaNHL I don’t get it, Jaffe was a good analyst & seemed like a good guy (not that being a good guy guarantees you a job)

ChrisBottaNHL Now the Islanders willingly say goodbye to a popular TV analyst who sold their rebuild on many outlets and did volunteer work for them.

You get the point. Jaffe is well liked/respected in the hockey community. You can bet your bottom dollar that the 41 year-old will land on his feet. A tough loss for local puckers but a gain for other fans.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Sabres reach terms with Kaleta

While there’s been plenty of noise over Ilya Kovalchuk, the Devils and the NHL, the Sabres have had their usual quiet summer. They watched Henrik Tallinder depart for Newark and replaced him with Jordan Leopold. While Tallinder’s loss might hurt, no one will miss Toni Lydman, who was the weakest link on the Buffalo blueline. The Finn moved to Anaheim where they’ll soon discover just how soft he is.

With little happening in Western New York other than one-time Devil Rob Niedermayer becoming Adam Mair’s replacement, teflon GM Darcy Regier actually got something done for a change today- re-signing gritty forward Patrick Kaleta. In reaching agreement (2 yrs, $1.815 million) with the 24 year-old pest who established new career bests in goals (10) and points (15) while adding 89 penalty minutes over 55 contests, the club avoided arbitration. A tedious process even the hometown kid wanted to avoid.

I was never a big fan of arbitration, going in there and pleading cases,” a pleased Kaleta told the Canadian Press. “So I’m happy to get it over and done with and not have to worry about it.”

For a player selected in the ’04 sixth round (176th overall), the former Peterborough OHL product hasn’t fared too badly, evolving into a third line energy type that drives opponents nuts. He loves to throw the weight around albeit sometimes after a player releases the puck, wreaking havoc and of course plenty of enemies. One such rival was ex-Ranger Paul Mara, who one night snapped after another borderline hit, getting himself tossed while Kaleta and his Buffalo ‘mates got the last laugh on the scoreboard. That’s his style. To agitate. He always seems to get the better of the Rangers, victimizing them with his first career two-goal game in a Sabre win at MSG on 12/12/09.

In ’09-10, he added offense to his resume improving on a four-goal, five assist ’08-09 by hitting double digits in goals for the first time in the NHL. Despite his antics, he’s an effective hockey player who should improve. Something that will make Sabre fans happy.

I had to look at it in a way that the team wanted me to play here next year no matter what,” Kaleta added in a piece on the official Buffalo Sabres site. “I’m proud of what I’ve accomplished so far personally as a hockey player in Buffalo. Hopefully it’s only a small portion of what I can do.

Now, if only Regier would open the wallet to further bolster a club that finished atop the Northeast before a disappointing first round ouster at the hands of bitter rival Boston. And by that, we don’t mean bringing back Patrick Lalime. As our resident Buffalo lurker might say, don’t get your hopes up.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kovalchuk in purgatory: Day Two thoughts

It’s been almost thirty-six hours since the NHL officially rejected the Devils’ 17-year $102 million contract for Ilya Kovalchuk and I’m still annoyed at this league for what seems like an arbitrary power play against the NHLPA in advance of the next CBA war in two years. Not to mention a power play against the Devils, since we know if it was the Kings, Blackhawks, Flyers and Red Wings that inked these deals they would be approved with only a half-hearted investigation later. Why do we know this…because it’s already happened! Specifically with Marian Hossa in Chicago where the league approved the contract then half-heartedly investigated after the fact.

True, I admit the Devils pushed the boundaries even further than those other teams adding a couple more years onto the deal, making multiple years at the end of the deal minimum salary and under $1 million and changing the no-movement clause of the first several years to a no-trade in the last several after a one-year window where Kovy can be traded or moved at will. While that hasn’t gotten as much play as the number, I never heard of that kind of no-movement clause either. Yet, it’s all legal under the CBA. How do we know this…because Lou Lamoriello hired a former NHL employee who helped work on the CBA to be what in the NFL you would call a ‘cap guru’.

With all that you would think the league doesn’t have a case, right? Well I guess that depends on just how broad the NHL’s powers are in this CBA, which now doesn’t seem worth the paper it’s printed on – just like the Confederate dollar – and whether they have the right to arbitrarily reject a contract. If they do have a ‘best interests in the game clause’ then I call shenanigans over why they didn’t do it before. I guess Original Six teams can get away with it (Philly too, though they hamstrung themselves while being cute since Chris Pronger was over 35 when he signed his deal so his retirement doesn’t help them), but not us.

More to the point though, to illustrate the shenanigans involved here consider that while this fight is going on the NHLPA still hasn’t picked an executive director (as much as I can’t stand Don Fehr, the former MLBPA director who’s up for the same post here, I wouldn’t mind the NHLPA sicing him after Gary Bettman in a courtroom right about now). And unbelievably after five years of the CBA both sides still don’t have an arbitrator in place for contract disputes. Granted this has never come up before to where there has been an arbitrator needed but still, it shows an unbelievable lack of foresight. Especially with the direction contracts were taking.

So part of the NHL’s ‘principled’ stand is catching its adversary the NHLPA with its pants down. This saga could wind up being the Archduke assasination moment of the next CBA war (oh joy). You would think the skeleton crew that runs the NHLPA has to file a grievance over the NHL arbitrarily rejecting this contract, and they have until Monday 5 PM to do so. What comes after that is likely a messy process where the NHL drags its feet on approving an arbiter – since both sides have to agree to one first. Perhaps the NHL’s counting on the fact the Devils won’t be willing to take it to court because any hearing might not take place till after the start of the season, and the Devils would have to pre-emptively make a move to get under the salary cap since they can’t be over it once the season starts.

If that’s the case though I think Bettman’s surprisingly underestimated his opponent. This is a GM that took on the league and won in the Jim Schoenfeld suspension in the wake of the ‘donut’ incident during the 1988 playoffs, and won again when he not only proved the Blues tampered with Brendan Shanahan but also successfuly argued for Scott Stevens as compensation. I don’t think Lou’s going to avoid a principled stand now.

Where Lou might have to answer some questions is over some of his quotes two days ago during the Kovalchuk press conference where he admitted contracts like this shouldn’t be allowed though he quickly added ‘but they’re legal under the CBA and ownership was willing to make the commitment to this player’. Some thought he was trying to distance himself from the deal and give the credit (or blame?) to owner Jeff Vanderbeek but I don’t believe Lou was trying to get himself fired, especially mere weeks after signing an extension himself.

More than likely Lou gave his opinion of Kovalchuk as a hockey player and Vanderbeek decided how far the team should go business-wise to sign him, with Lou doing his best to get the player to sign as evidenced by the recruiting work Kovy agent Jay Grossman saying Lou did to get this deal done. Lou saying he rolled his eyes over the contract length and value would be like me rolling my eyes at people paying over $100 for a seat at a regular-season hockey game, maybe we wouldn’t do it with ‘our’ money but Vanderbeek didn’t get to be as successful as he was by nickel-and-diming it either.

There’s also the question of what Lou knew, and when in the wake of an ESPN report last night that Lou knew Monday night that the NHL ‘would’ reject the Kovalchuk contract yet the team still went ahead with the press conference the next day. Of course Devil-hater Scott Burnside broke the story and colleague E.J.Hradek backed him up. Then Tom Gulutti claimed to have the same information, until he realized he was mistaken and in fact Lou was told that the contract ‘possibly’ would be rejected. Don’t these journalists know there’s a big difference between would be rejected and could be rejected? A fifth-grader can understand that.

Of course there’s been no retraction of the ESPN story yet as far as I know and I’m not sure how much I’d buy it even if it wasn’t Burnside (who makes even Mark Everson look like the Devils’ biggest fan in comparison to his trolling). Vanderbeek for his part claimed not to know the contract was rejected even Tuesday night. Would Lou go ahead with the press conference without telling the owner something that volitaile? Doubtful unless he had a career death wish. If there was prior knowledge there’s no way he wouldn’t tell Grossman or Kovy, witholding that kind of info could get them to bolt in a huff once the contract would be rejected and as of now they haven’t made one peep other than Grossman expressing dissapointment that the deal was rejected.

So either they all knew beforehand or they didn’t…if they did, then why go ahead with the press conference? As a preemptive salvo to the NHL? Perhaps, since Lou’s quotes at the time about the contract did seem a bit odd and out of place. To make it harder PR-wise for the NHL to reject the deal if they were still ‘thinking’ about it? That’s the only other plausible explanation that doesn’t involve anything sinister (i.e. getting Kovy to commit to the Devils publicly so he can’t back out of the deal). It seems odd to even be discussing these elaborate conspiracy theories and what they mean but does anything that happened in the last 48 hours seem normal to anyone else?

As to what happens next, it seems like we’re in a state of limbo until Monday afternoon. Theoretically if Lou and Grossman wanted to restructure the deal quietly before that point – or if they want to talk the NHLPA out of filing a grievance – they could but I don’t think they’re going to punt that easily. If the NHLPA does seek to pursue legal action then one of two things could happen I suppose. Either (after a few month-long process that will likely stretch into 2010-11) the Devils win arbitration and get the contract as is, or they lose and have to pay a fine which also counts against the cap. That’s perhaps the nuclear scenario from our standpoint, especially since Kovalchuk would go back to being UFA. Of course there are probably other scenarios that can come into play too but since this is so unprecedented information is still sketchy.

One thing’s for sure, this offseason has had as many twists and turns as any playoff run, and it’s not over yet.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

NHL rejects Kovalchuk contract

So apparently the deals for Marian Hossa and Chris Pronger which took them into their 40’s that already circumvented the spirit of the cap were allowable but the deal for Ilya Kovalchuk isn’t? Based on what, the fact Hossa and Pronger will be 41 and 42 when their deals are done and Kovy will be 44? Who is the NHL to determine what’s an acceptable age, since it hasn’t been done before? Chris Chelios is still playing at age 48 and Gordie Howe played professionally into his 50’s. I’m not saying it’s likely but come on, this is nonsense. You can’t arbitrarily create a precedent when you ignored it in the past.

I fully expect as in the past when Lou Lamoriello challenges the league, he’ll win yet again and the NHL will look even more foolish than it already is. God, I hate this league sometimes. Maybe Bobby Clarke whined again the way he did to get the trapezoid to neutralize Martin Brodeur, it wouldn’t be surprising since he was already proven a hypocrite there and his organization just had to dump Simon Gagne for a spoiled ham sandwich because of the cap. On some level though I guess it’s fitting. With all the twists and turns this saga has taken, why not a couple more?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Kovy thoughts from the swamp

I’m sitting here still flabbergasted over today’s events, not knowing how quite to start this blog. Especially since Derek’s already done a good job of summing up the news of the day. In case you haven’t been around for the last eight hours, the Devils have retained star winger Ilya Kovalchuk, in what came as a total shock to this blogger for two reasons.

One because the speculation of the last few days had him all but signed, sealed and delivered to Los Angeles. As the cynics pointed out though, if he wanted to go there as badly as some of his actions may have indicated then he would have found a way to take less and sign there. Clearly money wasn’t the sole factor though, since Kovy still turned down more from the Thrashers months ago and allegedly turned down lucrative money from Russia to stay in Newark.

Actually the bigger surprise to me was that the Devils’ biggest selling point – a winning organization – I thought took a big hit in Kovalchuk’s eyes after our quiet first-round exit in this year’s playoffs. Not so, in fact our reputation still worked in our favor as did GM Lou Lamoriello‘s personal touch (especially if you contrast it with Kings GM Dean Lombardi‘s public bluster), that made a difference according to agent Jay Grossman.
New Jersey remained absolutely steadfast in their interest. They were patient. They were understanding. They didn’t change their viewpoint, their position, anything in terms of their approach throughout the entire time.
“I think Lou, with his college background at Providence College as a recruiter, picked some of the tools out of his bag and he really was able to always call seemingly at the right time, always say the right thing. Again, you go out there and you look at things and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. He had a right to do it and, ulitimately, we realized that we came back to that point.”
Now that the Devils’ stunning 17-year, $102 million contract is ready for NHL approval and the yearly salary structure is public knowledge, the speculation will come over what’s next. Even with a surprisingly friendly cap hit of $6 million per season, the Devils will still have to move at least one player to get under the cap again before October since they were about $4 million under it before this deal.
Of course people will cry foul over this contract since Kovalchuk’s salary takes a dramatic downturn at age 39, leaving room for a mutual buyout at that point to get the cap hit off the books so that Kovy isn’t playing for minimum salary. Sure, it violates the spirit of the CBA and artifically lowers the cap hit but it’s not like this is unprecedented. Philly did it with Chris Pronger and the Hawks have done it with Marian Hossa. Why shouldn’t we take advantage of the rules too? Clearly in the next CBA negotiations this loophole will have to be closed one way or another.
And yes, there is always the inherent danger that Kovy can get hurt early in the deal a la Rick DiPietro and have the contract be a cap-killer but if Kovy was signed to a shorter term deal for more money and gets hurt in the first year, that deal would be even more of a cap-killer. Plus he isn’t over 35 at the time of signing the deal so the consequences of replacing an injured player are less prohibitive. You have to pay top money for top talent and there’s no disputing Kovy’s talent. To put the cap hit in perspective it’s less than Wade Redden‘s cap hit on the Rangers. And just a million dollars more than Brian Rolston on our own team. You have to give up something to get something, which in this case means giving up more money up front to get cap space.

True, $100 million in just over ten years is a lot of money to shell out for owner Jeff Vanderbeek, who’s made Grossman a rich man in recent weeks after deals with fellow clients Anton Volchenkov and Johan Hedberg. Not to sound cold, but that’s not my concern. I’m just glad we have an owner who’s a legit fan of the team and wants to win. Not every owner fits that category.

And a final word about the process, which took eighteen days to sort out from the start of free agency on July 1. Although I’ve given the media a lot of well-deserved flak for the myriad of speculation, false information and rumors that were utter rubbish you have to give credit to the one guy who did call this – Larry Brooks of the Post, who tweeted this specific contract offer days before it was agreed to by the Kovy camp. I guess a cynic could say if enough people venture a guess, at least one has to be right but you do have to give credit where it’s due.

Although Lou didn’t manage to keep that offer under wraps, kudos to him as a whole through the whole process. While former protege Lombardi was all over the place grandstanding (and a big haha to the fact he didn’t even get Simon Gagne, their supposed Plan B), Lou was in the background, seldom revealing much or negotiating through the media. Granted, he couldn’t offer much when the ball was in Kovy’s court but I’m glad he resisted the temptation to pull the offer and move on to other things the way a lot of Devils fans wanted him to do. Others have said that we should pull the offer because ‘clearly’ we weren’t Kovy’s first choice.

To that I say…so freaking what? As if every free agent automatically signs with their first choice. You think the Yankees or their fans would give back CC Sabathia a season and a half after they were, at best a sixth or seventh choice for him to go to behind the West Coast teams? I certainly don’t see Kovy as the type to lollygag it on a winner, maybe he did with the Thrashers as Chico Resch pointed out memorably during one Thrashers-Devils game early last season but it does become hard to get motivated to play on a perrenial loser. He was certainly more motivated last year than a lot of people who will also be Devils this season.

Whatever you want to say about Kovy’s defensive deficiencies, his contract, our glut of left wings and the fact that teams don’t win Cups in July you can’t deny the fact that today’s a good day for the Devils Legion. Businesswise despite the high salary it certainly helps Vanderbeek since the Devils sold out fifteen of eighteen games after Kovy came aboard last season. Plus it still leaves us with more than enough room to maintain fellow star Zach Parise beyond next season and on the ice, who wouldn’t want to add a perennial 40-goal, 90-point scorer? Teams can no longer key on Parise solely, which should open things up for him in April and beyond.

Now we never have to look back and wonder what might have been with Nicklas Bergfors, Johnny Oduya and Patrice Cormier. For once a big name stayed with the Devils. Most offseasons (other than 2006 when Patrik Elias and Jamie Langenbrunner re-upped) we’re lamenting over the ones that got away. Who would have ever suspected that we’d get both the top defensive defenseman on the market – Volchenkov – and retain the top offensive player by far in Kovy?
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Kovalchuk Breakdown Plus Why He Stayed Put

Credit the Devils for working with Ilya to get this done. Full credit to Puck Daddy’s own Dmitry Chesnokov, who’s been a beast during this monstrosity. Here’s the breakdown:

-earns $80 million over first 8 years hitting targeted $10 million average
-earns $15 million the next 2 years totaling 95 of 102 million thru first 10 years of contract
-earns $1 million-per-year over the final 7 years

On what Kovalchuk turned down, Dean Lombardi offered 15 for $80 million. By comparison, prior to being traded out of Atlanta, Ilya rejected a 12-year $101 million deal. Winning turned out to be most important to the 27 year-old fiery Russian with the rocket from the point. He gets his chance to do it in Jersey where Martin Brodeur has two years left on his contract and Zach Parise one before he re-signs. And yes, you know Lou will find a way to get it done. Just as he’ll somehow find a magical taker for Brian Rolston.

Also of interest is a solid column from Inside Hockey’s own Michelle Kenneth. She covers the team and had an excellent take on why Kovalchuk chose to remain in Newark. Entitled, “Ilya to Remain a Devil,” it’s a fascinating read. A couple of key aspects we liked:

First, building a team around him was a factor. The Devils moved in that direction and signed a couple of free agents to attract him to the team: Anton Volchenkov and Johan Hedberg. Both players are friends of Kovalchuk. Not only do the two signings make the locker room more comfortable for him, but it is also the beginning of a build around him.


Second, while many believe that inking Kovalchuk will create problems in re-signing Zach Parise next year, part of Kovalchuk’s decision to remain with the Devils is having Parise on board. The rivalries that could exist between the two players are merely a myth. It is very important that Parise remain on the team, because Kovalchuk wants his team to win. Parise is part of that design.


Third, Kovalchuk has repeated numerous times that he would take a paycut if it meant remaining with the Devils. He said it not once, but several times. A few weeks prior to free agency, that was still the same story being repeated. Whatever the offer was from the Devils, Kovalchuk’s decision was not purely based on the amount of money they were offering.

The point about them adding two former teammates in Heds and Volchenkov is dead on. Of course, he wants to win. So, retaining Zach Attack is a must even if many will compare the salary No.9 gets to No.17. And finally, he did take a paycut. Even if it’s frontloaded with him getting the desired salary he wanted during his remaining peak years, he did good by the team. A couple of other things she touches on that make sense:

In the true dynamics that is the Los Angeles Kings, as luxurious of an item as Kovalchuk would have been for them, their future would have dwindled in the signing. It was not in their best interests to ink Kovalchuk if it meant giving up their future. That is also a future that would effect Kovalchuk being part of a winning dynasty. That, in itself, would have made the offer from the Kings unattractive.


Kovalchuk wants to be part of a winning team more than anything else. Since Day One with the New Jersey Devils, he loved the philosophy of how important it was to win. Losing was such a big thing to the Devils. With Atlanta, he said that losing was not that big of a deal.

For the Devils, losing is a big deal. You don’t want to be on that end of the spectrum in Devils territory. You might find someone throwing a jar of jelly across the room.

Outstanding point on why LA didn’t fit. Even if they’d landed the sniper, it would have screwed them in the long run- forcing them to sell off players a la Chicago and Philly. What we saw with Simon Gagne going to Tampa for a bag of pucks was embarrassing. Nice way to treat the longest tenured Flyer, who really should be staying after how heroic he was in miraculous playoff run. Blame Paul Holmgren. We still can’t figure out what he saw in Andrej Meszaros. The other points on the Devils being about winning while Atlanta essentially wasn’t speak volumes. Nobody was happy with how this past Spring ended. Kovalchuk and the club had some unfinished business. So, he returns.
 
Now, we get to see how creative Lou is at finding takers for Rolston, Dainius Zubrus and perhaps Bryce Salvador. The Devs are built to win now. Will securing Kovalchuk finally translate to some post-lockout success?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Rumored Kovalchuk Numbers False, 17 for 102 Mill

Take it for what it’s worth. According to an ESPN report, the Devils’ richest star in franchise history Ilya Kovalchuk could be getting 17 years, $150 million when he makes it official at tomorrow’s press conference in Newark. Yiiiiiiiikkkkkkesssss.

I want you to repeat this 10 times fast.

SEV—–EN—–TEEN YEARS ONE—HUNDRED—–AND——FIF——TY MILL—–I—ON!!!!!!

There is no other way to describe it as insanity. This from one of the most respected GMs in sports. Woooooow.

UPDATE: Well, no great shock that Scott Burnside was wrong. The official numbers are 17 years for a cool $102 million. At six million a pop, I’d say Kovalchuk took a huge discount just so he could finish the rest of his career in the Garden State. Maybe he wanted to upstage buddy Alex Ovechkin. But there’s no way he’s worth as much as Ovi and that played out with many teams not even bothering. Is Ilya one of the best pure snipers in the game? Absolutely. Can he put up points in a hurry? No doubt. But what other team was seriously going to give him that much security? Not only did Lou once again score big here but got the exciting Russian at a bargain, which means he should be able to re-sign top priority Zach Parise next summer. Only the Devils could pull something like this off. That’s what you get when the GM knows too many loopholes in what’s become a flawed system. So much for the cap resolving everything.

How is it good for the league that basically, three teams vyed for his services and one was from the KHL? He priced himself out. Here’s one huge question we’re hoping a reporter will have enough guts to ask tomorrow.

Q: Were the Devils your top choice?

A: Da!

:as Dean Lombardi chokes up his drink:

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Kovalchuk D-Day: Re-signs with Devils For 17 Years

Well, after 16 days of chaos, it looks like Ilya Kovalchuk has finally come to a decision. That is if you can take his American agent Jay Grossman at his word via this tweet:

Jay_Grossman: Ilya Kovalchuk will make his decision today (for sure, this time!).

Personally, I don’t care either way. As long as the Rangers aren’t involved, we’re good. The electrifying Russian sniper is expected to choose LA over New Jersey. Whatever. If the Devils do finish runner-up, we should be hearing from our resident Kool Aid blogger. What if he chooses them after all this drama? Wouldn’t that have made these couple of weeks a waste? If he really wanted to be a Devil, he would’ve just re-signed already.

It would still be nice to get a conclusion so we can get on with the rest of the summer. Just don’t hold your breath.

UPDATE: Based on a tweet from the New Jersey Devils, it looks like Kovalchuk is returning.

NHLDevils: HE’S BACK: Ilya Kovalchuk signs with the Devils. Press conference scheduled for Tuesday at the Rock.  

Simply amazing. Honestly, he and his agent teased everyone. Especially the Kings. Leaking the announcement irks me. I wanted to find out from the man himself. But the Devils ruined it. Guess they just couldn’t wait to rub it in everyone’s faces. Nothing like good PR. Did we just say that about a Lou Lams run franchise? The Devs have changed. Thank Jeff Vanderbeek.

What this does ensure is the Devils must start cutting payroll. Likely candidates are Brian Rolston, Bryce Salvador and Dainius Zubrus. Let the firesale commence.

UPDATE II: Per reliable Puck Daddy Russian reporter Dmitry Chesnokov, it looks like Kovalchuk’s deal is for 17 years…

dchesnokov Kovalchuk’s mother tells Pavel Lysenkov of Sovetsky Sport that Kovalchuk’s deal with #NJD is for 17 years.

Wow. That is insanity. Nobody can ever talk about the Devils being fiscally responsible after this. They just committed 17 years to Kovalchuk, who by the end of the contract, would be 44. I thought these kinda deals were done but apparently not. Even the great Lou has lost it. Anything to justify the means I guess. He does make their club stronger at least on paper. Whether it finally translates to New Jersey going deep in the playoffs remains to be seen. Also up in for debate is how this megasigning affects Zach Parise, who turns restricted next summer. There could be a lot more changes coming to Newark over the next year.

The press conference is tomorrow live at The Prudential Center at 1 ET.

UPDATE III: Per Chesnokov, it looks like the deal is 17 years for over $100 million. Yikes. What lockout?!?!?!?!?! Guess there’s gonna be another one. I am mystified.

dchesnokov The 17 years, $100m+ for Kovalchuk is what I stand by.

It should be interesting to see the particulars. I don’t know anymore. I now think 2004-05 was a total farce.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sauer returns

Unlike a Stone Temple Pilots hit song, there was nothing sour the other day for Mike Sauer. The last link to the Brian Leetch trade re-signed with the Rangers Thursday. The 22 year-old St. Cloud, Minnesota native was selected by the club in the 2005 second round 40th overall ahead of Paul Stastny.

For the younger brother of Kurt Sauer, injuries have been the issue. In three pro seasons spent mostly with Hartford, the defenseman’s missed 50 games, including 40 in ’09-10 which derailed his chances of getting another cameo on Broadway. He previously played three NHL games in 2008-09 registering two shots and posting a minus-one rating before John Tortorella overreacted to a poor second outing. Ironically, that year was his best- going 6-17-23, plus-29 with 35 penalty minutes, 2 PPG and 1 GW in 64 contests for the Wolf Pack.

Despite a strong season, Sauer was passed on the depth chart by impressive rookie Michael Del Zotto, who made the quantum leap from juniors to the NHL. Perhaps he wasn’t given a fair shake due to the coach. Aside from that, the issue of Wade Redden didn’t help. It looks like the Redden Era Error is about to end. Especially when you consider that the Blueshirts have already taken care of most of the blueline in re-signing Dan Girardi, signing Ryan McDonagh and adding Steve Eminger in the Aaron Voros trade to Anaheim.

With only vital anchor Marc Staal left, it’s setting up to be an interesting September. While we’re still six and a half weeks away from it, it’s never too early to look at where the Rangers are on a D which must improve. Incumbents Michal Rozsival, Staal (once signed), Girardi and Del Zotto are all but assured of the top four. After that, it’s anyone’s guess as to who makes up the final three. Redden and sophomore Matt Gilroy figure to get  healthy competition from Eminger, McDonagh and Sauer. With overwhelming support for Tinman to be dumped to Hartford, the competition is welcome.

One big question remains. If Staal signs and the kids outshine Redden, does Glen Sather have the guts to finally admit his big error by designating the veteran for assignment? Only time shall tell.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rangers sign Dupont

The Rangers re-signed forward Brodie Dupont. The former 2005 third round pick played 80 games for AHL affiliate Hartford posting 17 goals and 22 assists for 39 points while racking up 124 penalty minutes. He ranked fifth in goals and points while his two shorthanded goals tied for second on the club.

In bringing back the 23 year-old out of Russell, Manitoba, the Blueshirts are giving a player who netted his 100th career AHL point on Apr.3 at Springfield one more shot. At best, he sounds like a two-way pivot who can provide energy. Maybe he’ll compete against incumbent fourth line center Brian Boyle in camp. Otherwise, it’s another year in the ‘A.’

Just another organizational move as we still patiently wait on Marc Staal. As long as it doesn’t evolve into the Kovalchuk $aga.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment